What the hell is a Grammar Anarchist?
You can be one! Since we don’t have a U.S. language, feel FREE to set your own rules -- interpret grammar YOUR WAY. You’re not in England anymore. Join the anarchy of U.S. grammar! Make your choices and preserve them in YOUR STYLE MANUAL. —The Grammar Anarchist
“Of course we have rules,” my friend told me.
“Uh-uh,” I shook my head. “A real rule does not have exceptions.”
“What about: ‘I before E except after... ’ oh yeah! Now I get it!”
7 comments:
Bettyjane
said...
"Exceptions prove the rule" is what I learned in school. If that's so, the i-before-e is a RULE!!!
Language in this country is a game. And since we can't agree on which rules are to be followed and which to be ignored, we writers have to decide for ourselves, won't we! Drag out that Style Book, Betts, and get back to writing.
A whole bunch of words don’t fit into either this “rule” or the noted exception. Memorize this sentence and you’ll remember these peculiar words: seize the weird counterfeit heights with a sleight of hand. (I read this somewhere.)
7 comments:
"Exceptions prove the rule" is what I learned in school. If that's so, the i-before-e is a RULE!!!
If you say so, BJ, and you make my point! Would you dare exceptions to the rules of mah-jong? Guess they aren't rules then.
Game rules are different.
Language in this country is a game. And since we can't agree on which rules are to be followed and which to be ignored, we writers have to decide for ourselves, won't we! Drag out that Style Book, Betts, and get back to writing.
A whole bunch of words don’t fit into either this “rule” or the noted exception. Memorize this sentence and you’ll remember these peculiar words: seize the weird counterfeit heights with a sleight of hand. (I read this somewhere.)
I think I’ll stick to my rule!
Thought of two more words that challenge the “E before I”. How about “either” and “neither”?
Post a Comment